Talk:Monster Hunter Evolution - My Theories/@comment-99.67.20.85-20121115045744

I realize this theory is tentative and amateur, and I'm not going to hound you about it. However, one thing that is often understated is that the reason mammals grew more populous was because of the death of the dinosaurs. Due to their small size, they were able to survive, and were the ones left and grew. If the dinosaurs didn't die as they did, simply put, mammals wouldn't exist. Similarly, would you put humans as pelagi? And also, one thing about the gigginox is egg sacs, and in general, the definition of mammal used is incredibly loose.

However, it's interesting and a fun read. I try the same thing, then I remember that hunters can hold bombs, potions, steroids, and every other thing in their back packs.

With a few changes, this could work. But if you think tigrex is independent, surely it would make more sense for equally competitive mutated individuals, such as the barioth and nargacuga to exist.

And yes, evolution can be very drastic. However, it would be much better to work on this one monster at a time, rather than whole classifications, as that would be much more accurate. For example, diablos are monoblos with some king of polydactyl, and it was useful, and since the blos are territorial but rarely kill each other and are herbivores that have a huge desert at their wings, it would make sense that the monoblos still survives coexistance with the better adapted diablos.Just an example.